Connecticut

Step 4: Measure the impact and enhance accountability.

For each policy adopted by Connecticut policymakers, an appropriate state agency was selected to set performance measures and projected outcomes and evaluate the effectiveness of established programs.

Evaluations of the probation violation programs show promising results.

The state institutionalized systems to provide elected officials with regular reports reviewing trends in the prison population, and to develop population projections, track outcomes and recommend policy options.

  1. See Central Connecticut State University, Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, “Addendum to the Final Report of the Court Support Services Division’s Probation Transition Program and Technical Violation Unit,” June 2006.
  2. Ibid.
  3. See Fiscal Impact “Raised Bill #5651 An Act Adopting The Recommendations of the Report Of The Commission On Prison And Jail Overcrowding.”
  4. Connecticut General Assembly, Substitute House Bill 6976, Public Act No. 05-249, “An Act Concerning Criminal Justice Planning and Eligibility for Crime Victim Compensation”, enacted 2005.
  5. Connecticut General Assembly, Substitute House Bill 5781, Public Act No. 06-193, “An Act Concerning Criminal Justice Policy and Planning and the Establishment of a Sentencing Task Force”, enacted 2006.